Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-1344907-20140816173348/@comment-3184885-20140905170347

My thing is, Sims 4 is a sequal to Sims 3. With this in mind, Sims 4 should be an improvement to Sims 3 In ways, it is. But at the same time, they've taken so many key elements from the previous games to make these new features a reality that they've made it lesser of a product than it's predicesor. Sims 3 showed MASSIVE improvments compared to Sims 2, as did Sims 2 to The Sims. Sims 4 should have been a much better improvement to Sims 3, and I feel they could have very easily had made it that way. So in all honesty, I'm more disappointed in the game rather than angry. It 'not being as bad as Sims City' does not a good game make, nor does it warrent the price they are asking for it.

All in all, if the price dropped drastically. I may pick it up, but as for the time being, I'm poor and I'm not going to spend my money and what is a sub-par game.